+44 (0)20 7183 0254 info@thesoundpipemedia.com


At 10pm on June 23, 2016, the polls closed on a United kingdom referendum on EU membership and the counting commenced.

The future morning Europeans woke to the information that the British public experienced voted to depart the 28 Member State bloc termed the European Union. The outcome was fifty two for every cent to depart, 48 for every cent to remain. The hideous word Brexit — coined ahead of the referendum as a shorthand conflation for ‘British exit’ — was seemingly now lodged in the lexicon for excellent. But what is Brexit? And what does it necessarily mean for startups in the United kingdom and Europe?

For starters it’s necessary to consider what the European Union is. The obstacle of comprehending the European undertaking, as it’s from time to time termed, is inextricably sure up with any explanation of the vote to depart the EU. Even supporters of the EU can have trouble articulating the scope and direction of a political, economic and fiscal union that has unquestionably swelled in sizing and intent over time. But at its most standard degree the EU is a group of nations around the world seeking to collaborate on factors like trade for mutual economic benefit, with the founding intention of avoiding any catastrophic reruns of the region’s combative background.

A further relevant shorthand below is the word ‘Brussels’: the political seat of the European undertaking in the funds city in Belgium where by the Fee, the EU’s laws proposing executive physique, is based mostly. It is also the nickname of option utilised to badge the EU by anti-EU media. Headlines in United kingdom media railing against the latest ‘diktat from Brussels’ have long conveyed a narrative of national sovereignty currently being battered and bruised from afar — implying this is 1 of the principal ingredients of currently being a member of the EU, alternatively than flagging the possible and actual advantages of erasing some of the barriers that divide up a location of some five hundred million individuals.

Enter then, the Brexit campaigners’ mantra of ‘taking back again control’, and with hindsight it was correctly pitched to exploit a populist narrative of faceless Brussels bureaucrats meddling in national matters — and change the in/out referendum into a bloody nose for establishment anticipations. The truth of the EU is a lot a lot more very long-winded and difficult to digest than the alternate and more than-simplistic clarion call to ‘cut and run’. But some 17.4 million individuals voted for Brexit vs sixteen.1M voting to remain (turnout was just over 72 for every cent) so the United kingdom now faces the unprecedented obstacle of having to extricate by itself from a lot more than forty yrs of EU involvement — detangling and comprehending a massive physique of regulation and restrictions — and, likely, also forging its personal set of bilateral buying and selling associations thereafter, all while carrying the massive load of uncertainty that Brexit inexorably delivers.

Why does Brexit mean uncertainty? Since the United kingdom governing administration has still to set out a comprehensive system or strategy for Brexit. Whilst it is under growing pressure to do so. Nor can we know for sure what kind of deal the other facet in this divorce, the EU, will be willing to present the United kingdom. And in the same way that breakfast can necessarily mean several different factors to several different individuals, there are several different possible Brexits — so the £59 billion question at this stage on the UK’s very long and torturously winding street to leaving the EU is what Brexit will basically mean?

Hard or delicate?

The early symptoms are that the United kingdom governing administration — led by post-Brexit PM Theresa Could — is heading for a so-termed ‘hard Brexit’, as it looks set on prioritizing putting caps on EU immigration — which would necessarily mean, in all chance, being cut off from access to the EU Single Current market: the keystone principal of the European undertaking which erases barriers on the motion of goods, funds, expert services and individuals throughout the location in buy to change a sequence of discrete nations around the world into a single buying and selling bloc. If the United kingdom decides to place a red line on the free motion of individuals it can’t realistically assume the EU to allow for it to retain accessibility to the Single Current market. The EU’s personal priorities in trying to get to preserve the broader Union kick in. So presenting the United kingdom a sweet pick’n’mix deal would be viewed as encouraging other Member States to break ranks. And the EU has already been warning Switzerland of its red line on flexibility of motion.

In the wake of the Brexit vote, the UK governing administration also recognized a new division for Intercontinental Trade — which heavily indicates it’s envisaging a upcoming exterior the Single Current market, i.e. where by it’s chopping its personal trade specials, alternatively than currently being element of the EU buying and selling bloc.

Without having accessibility to the Single Current market, United kingdom providers offering goods or expert services to the EU would be addressed like any other region exterior the EU that also does not have a trade or other treaty with the bloc — that means tariffs, non-tariff barriers and very long-due to the fact-mothballed customs checks and administration coming into sudden, unwelcome drive. So, in other words and phrases, an overnight stop to how United kingdom businesses presently trade freely with the EU (and the bloc’s many buying and selling companions).

Increase to that, negotiating a new trade treaty with the EU is not broadly deemed credibly possible in the considerably less than two-calendar year timeframe afforded for the Report fifty EU exit course of action. Nor has the EU signaled it is willing to converse trade treaties throughout this period of time. Au contraire it’s likely no trade talks could happen until eventually Brexit experienced to start with been accomplished. So except if some kind of transitionary period of time can be negotiated by the United kingdom governing administration — and which is starting up to search like a lot more of a possibility at this stage, with critical Brexit ministers at least now willing to countenance it — we have only the prospect of deepening enterprise uncertainty in the short phrase.

There is another possibility: a delicate Brexit, where by the United kingdom leaves the EU yet retains accessibility to the Single Current market (e.g., for case in point, a Swiss design model. Or by being in the European Economic Area, like Norway). Which could mean business as just about regular. The problem with this circumstance is, as noted above, it would however mean agreeing to the free motion of individuals — and that flies in the facial area of the populist politics that delivered the Brexit vote. ‘Taking back again control’ was not just about nationwide sovereignty there was a unique, not-so-undercurrent of xenophobia throughout the marketing campaign. And — for regardless of what explanation — the United kingdom government’s latest trajectory looks to be currently being plotted by the toughest of challenging Brexiteers. Which indicates the United kingdom now suddenly seems to have adopted its own red line on EU immigration.

In Oct, the Prime Minister herself explained: “I want [Brexit] to give British providers the maximum flexibility to trade with and operate in the Single Current market — and allow European businesses do the same below. But allow me be very clear.  We are not leaving the European Union only to give up regulate of immigration again.  And we are not leaving only to return to the jurisdiction of the European Court docket of Justice.”

So we return, inexorably, to the prospect of challenging Brexit: the United kingdom equally exiting the EU and leaving the Single Current market, pulling United kingdom companies out of their recognized processes in the process — however a lot the PM promises she would like to retain accessibility to the Single Current market. (As Donald Trump may place it, you cannot normally get what you want.)

Brexit and tech

But why is Brexit relevant for tech? For starters because startups are businesses with an above average chance of offering expert services exterior the domestic United kingdom market, offered the world achieve of the World-wide-web. So the upcoming of how United kingdom startups scale is at stake — along with the upcoming of London and the United kingdom as a European startup hub.

If, as is a unique chance, United kingdom fintech providers drop accessibility to fiscal passporting — the procedure that lets EU providers to promote expert services throughout the location devoid of needing to be regulated in each and every region — it’s incredibly likely we’ll see fiscal expert services providers shifting staff members and even headquarters to other EU capitals. In truth, we’re begining to see some of that starting up to happen presently — along with alarm bells sounding that the United kingdom governing administration truly demands to protected a transitional period of time to protect against a mass Brexit exodus of fintech companies. Income, individuals and ideas going elsewhere will change the stability of startup innovation in the location and further than.

The huge drop in the price of the UK’s currency, pound sterling, due to the fact the Brexit vote is presently impacting London’s competitiveness on the salary front vs other European cities — so where by a London wage was a major pull variable right before, because of the pound’s strength, United kingdom startups are both having to present better wages or facial area stiffer competitors on the selecting front from work opportunities in Berlin, Paris and elsewhere in Europe. Increasing inflation in the United kingdom is also pushing up the cost of residing, which may in change erode the attractiveness of setting up a enterprise in London.

And while the United kingdom has, up to now, punched above its European pounds in conditions of accessibility to funding, as perfectly as having the pull of a sizable domestic market the relieve of the English language and the vibrant range and famed tolerance of its capital metropolis to propose it as a base for entrepreneurship, other European cities will unquestionably get up the slack if the region helps make a challenging Brexit, throttling its all-vital talent pipeline by clamping down on immigration and amping up unwelcoming nationalist rhetoric, as perfectly as (in this challenging circumstance) getting rid of fiscal passporting, bouncing out of the Single Current market and having the bolster of accessibility to the European Financial commitment Fund removed. So whether or not it’s Dublin, Berlin, Paris or Stockholm, EU cities are presently jockeying for situation and to pitch on their own as an alternate, welcoming regional base for startup founders fearing what Brexit indicates for the upcoming of London and the United kingdom.

The EU is also consulting on insurance policies aimed at supporting what it dubs a Digital Single Current market — by seeking to harmonize restrictions that pertain to digital enterprise to allow for for a freer flow of electronic expert services throughout the location, and develop in help for relevant regions these kinds of as electronic capabilities. While this is however a function in progress, and likely a lot considerably less vital in the around phrase than fiscal passporting, a United kingdom which is exterior the EU would have to figure out its prioritizes vis-a-vis this Digital Single Current market. Any United kingdom businesses wishing to do enterprise within the EU would however require to comply with, for case in point, EU data defense regulation. So the scope for Brexit affording UK providers the ability to ‘free’ on their own from EU regulation and do factors otherwise is likely to be minimal to where they intend to promote expert services. If a startup is offering domestically it may be able to sidestep some EU regulation immediately after the United kingdom has Brexited. But as before long as it seeks to scale to promote within the EU it’s likely to require to comply with EU regulation. So any potential ‘freedom’ presented by Brexit looks very minimal in truth from a startup perspective.

The Brexit vote also fractured UK culture along multiple lines, with United kingdom entrepreneurs 1 of the teams voting massively in favor of remaining. So Brexit can feel like a thing of an anti-change, anti-technological innovation vote. Some commentators have gone so much as to argue it is element of a larger populist motion which is kicking against tech-enabled globalization and tech-driven automation — perhaps also helping to raise Trump to ability in the US. Witnessed by that lens Brexit can look like a rejection of several of the new things startups are pushing for. And while background tells us that progress is not linear, a counter social movement against the thrust of program-enabled disruption feels like a thing of a wake up simply call. If the advantages of startup disruption are not currently being similarly dispersed then technological innovation by itself looks susceptible to currently being rocked by populist movements channeled via existing political methods.

Similarly, the Brexit vote could be a portent that the full European undertaking is also much a lot more susceptible to break up than its very long yrs of collaboration and consensus-based mostly rulemaking may advise. And a broader break up of the European Union would make Brexit’s sinkhole of uncertainty look like a drop in the ocean.

Highlighted Image: Bryce Durbin/TechCrunch